The United Nations has a structural absurdity problem, and it is no longer possible to dismiss it as an anomaly. Iran — the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, a country that executed 65 women in 2025 alone and enforces a system its own UN Special Rapporteur has called “gender apartheid” — now sits on UN bodies shaping policy on women’s rights, nuclear nonproliferation, and terrorism prevention. Rep. Brian Mast and the House Foreign Affairs Committee are not wrong to ask whether this is satire.

The recent confirmation of Zeina Jallad to a six-year term as a United Nations human rights expert marks a troubling moment for the integrity of international institutional oversight. During the 61st session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Jallad was appointed as the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures, a role intended to provide objective analysis on the humanitarian effects of international sanctions. However, the process by which she attained this mandate, and the controversial history she brings to it, suggests a significant breakdown in the vetting standards expected of the world’s primary human rights body.